System no-fault - konfrontacja teorii z rzeczywistością
Zapisuję
Zapisz
Zapisane
No-fault jest obecnie odmieniany przez wszystkie przypadki przez osoby związane z organizacją ochrony zdrowia w Polsce. Minister Adam Niedzielski, Rzecznik Praw Pacjenta Bartłomiej Chmielowiec czy nowo wybrany Prezes Naczelnej Rady Lekarskiej Łukasz Jankowski stawiają to rozwiązanie jako jedną z istotniejszych zmian do wprowadzenia w Polsce. A jak wygląda rzeczywistość w krajach, gdzie takie rozwiązanie wprowadzono?
Bezpieczeństwo pacjenta
Dołącz do dyskusji
Źródła
- Bismark M, Dauer E, Paterson R, Studdert D (2006b) Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 17: 889-894
- Jonsson PM, Øvretveit J (2008) Patient claims and complaints data for improving patient safety. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 21: 60-74.
- Wallis K (2013) New Zealand’s 2005 ‘no-fault’ compensation reforms and medical professional accountability for harm. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 126 (1371): 33-44.
- Dickson K, Hinds K, Burchett H, Brunton G, Stansfield C, Thomas J (2016) No-fault compensation schemes: A rapid realist review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
- Harrington R, Foster M, Fleming J (2015) Experiences of pathways, outcomes and choice after severe traumatic brain injury under no-fault versus fault-based motor accident insurance. Brain Injury, 29: 1561-1571.
- Marchisio E.2020. Medical Civil Liability Without Deterrence: Preliminary Remarks for Future Research. Journal of Civil Law Studies 13
- Johnston W.F., Rodriguez R.M., Suarez D., Fortman J.. 2014. Study of Medical Students' Malpractice Fear and Defensive Medicine: A “Hidden Curriculum?” Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 15(3): 293–98. 10.5811/westjem.2013.8.19045.
- Antoci A., Maccioni A.F., Russu P.. 2016. The Ecology of Defensive Medicine and Malpractice Litigation. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150523. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150523.
- Cunningham W., Dovey S.. 2006. Defensive Changes in Medical Practice and the Complaints Process: A Qualitative Study of New Zealand Doctors. New Zealand Medical Journal 119(1244): U2283.
- Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) “Impact of legal reforms on medical malpractice costs” Library Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, Washington DC. 20510.
- World Bank. 2013. Medical Malpractice Systems Around the Globe: Examples from the US–Tort Liability System and the Sweden–No Fault System.
- Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1994 Jun 25;343(8913):1609-13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93062-7. PMID: 7911925.
- Collier R.2012. Professionalism: The Privilege and Burden of Self-Regulation. CMAJ 184(14): 1559–60. 10.1503/cmaj.109-4286.
- Epps T.2011. Regulation of Health Care Professionals. In Downie J.G., Caulfield T.A., Flood C.M., eds., Canadian Health Law and Policy (4th ed.) (pp. 75–114). LexisNexis Canada.
- Dixon-Woods M., Yeung K., Bosk C.L.. 2011. Why Is U.K. Medicine No Longer a Self-Regulating Profession? The Role of Scandals Involving “Bad Apple” Doctors. Social Science & Medicine 73(10): 1452–59.
Polecane artykuły
